× TinyFish · independent concept
Hiring evidence packet · screening decision
Four inspectable projects provide enough evidence for an authorized reviewer to decide whether to advance to a structured technical interview. Contribution scope, employment and degree conferral still require interview or first-party verification before an offer.
Clade exposes a multi-surface AI delivery system with plugins, MCP, evidence controls, tests and documentation.
GPT4o-Receipt and VoxBlink-CN expose evaluation and large-scale multimodal data work.
Public association is visible; exact contribution, production reliability and user impact need direct review.
Does: provider-neutral control plane for coding-agent delivery, evidence, verification and correction learning.
Visible depth: runtime adapters, Claude/Codex plugins, MCP, orchestrator, tests, security and release docs; recorded Fetch bound 13,202 chars and 274 links.
Ask: show one trust path, hardest failure and personally owned code/test. Sole authorship and impact remain unverified.
Does: benchmark and human study for AI-generated receipt forensics.
Visible depth: arXiv lists Alex Shen among nine authors; 1,235 images, five multimodal models, 30 annotators, 12 pages, seven figures and seven tables.
Ask: which dataset/evaluation component was owned and what failure changed the design? Individual scope remains unverified.
Does: two audio-visual collection pipelines for Chinese speaker-verification data.
Visible depth: DKU names Xingyu Shen; repository reports 41,634 speakers, 789,321 videos, 11,385 hours and 3.64M utterances.
Ask: identify the owned stage, quality metric and largest failure. Exact code ownership and dataset compliance remain unverified.
Does: co-author, citation, word-frequency and theme-river views for research orientation.
Visible depth: Duke association plus Python app/preprocessing, demo data and Docker deployment in the public repository.
Ask: demo one view, data model and bottleneck. Exact contribution, maintained use and impact remain unverified.
Open the four linked artifacts. If the visible systems, ML/data and research evidence fit the actual job rubric, a human reviewer may advance, hold or conclude this role-specific review under the employer's documented process. Any interview should test ownership, failure handling and impact.
Suggested evidence state: screening-ready · human decision pending.
× TinyFish · independent conceptSource coverage + contribution evidence
The seven selected Fetch targets are one recorded slice, not the whole report and not a product ceiling. Search leads, candidate cross-links, contribution metadata and unresolved namesakes remain visible without being promoted to facts.
Fetch exact personal site, GitHub, portfolio, DOI, ORCID and issuer URLs first.
Combine disclosed aliases with employer, school, project, publication and repository context.
GitHub for engineers, Scholar/ORCID for academics, submitted work for low-footprint candidates.
Stop on claim coverage, no new non-name anchor, rights block or budget—not an arbitrary seven calls.
| Source | Recorded state | What it adds | Limit / next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal site ↗ | SUBMITTED ANCHOR | Candidate-controlled cluster and project links. | Self-attested; does not verify employment or ownership. |
| GitHub ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Exact handle, repositories and outbound profile links. | Profile/repo location is not individual contribution proof. |
| LinkedIn ↗ | SEARCH POSITION 1 · NOT FETCHED | Exact name/school/employer lead plus candidate cross-links. | Login-limited; tenant-authorized or human review only. |
| Google Scholar ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Candidate-linked research and publication context. | Does not prove contribution quality. |
| X / Twitter ↗ | GITHUB CROSS-LINK · NOT FETCHED | Candidate-linked social handle for optional inspection. | No post content acquired; reference only. |
| Personal blog ↗ | SEARCH LEAD · NOT FETCHED | Writing and professional-interest lead. | Inspect individual posts before using any claim. |
| GPT4o-Receipt ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Author listing and research artifact. | Individual contribution scope remains unverified. |
| Dataset ↗ | SEARCH LEAD · NOT FETCHED | Reviewer-accessible artifact linked to the paper. | Hosting does not establish ownership. |
| Clade ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Inspectable system under submitted account. | Sole authorship, adoption and impact remain open. |
| VoxBlink-CN ↗ | LINKED PROJECT | Code/data artifact aligned to DKU context. | Exact contribution and compliance need review. |
| RTVis repository ↗ | ORGANIZATION REPOSITORY | Inspectable implementation aligned to Duke record. | Commit-level contribution required. |
| Duke RTVis ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Institutional association with project. | Not degree or code-contribution verification. |
| DKU VoxBlink-CN ↗ | SEARCHED + FETCHED | Institutional association with project. | Not exact project ownership. |
| Duke award page ↗ | PROBABLE LEAD · REVIEW | Potential additional institutional context. | Name + institution is insufficient for attachment. |
× TinyFish · independent conceptAppendix · not part of Alex review
This page is not candidate evidence and was not run for Alex. When purpose, notice, jurisdiction and employer policy separately authorize this lane, the query plan may include DOJ, FBI, IC3 or court public indexes using disclosed names plus non-secret professional anchors. A no-hit is not clearance; a same-name hit remains unassigned; positive attribution still requires compound identifiers and independent IDV.
Attach as self-attested professional context and label it.
Attach only the narrow claim supported by independent non-name identifiers.
Keep an unassigned namesake cluster—even on an official domain.
Record coverage and time. Never call the result clearance.
The labelled packet was reconstructed from public DOJ and FBI records; it is not an original application, ID, résumé or interview video. The indictment alleges that Jong Pong Ju used the alias Bryan Cho and an identification document combining his face with other identifying information. Allegations are unproven and the defendant is presumed innocent.
| Source | Recorded state | What it supports | What it cannot decide |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ release ↗ | FETCHED · HASH-BOUND | Official description of coordinated DPRK remote-worker actions. | That an ordinary candidate is involved. |
| U.S. v. Kim et al. indictment ↗ | FETCHED · ALLEGATION | Paragraph-level Bryan Cho / Jong Pong Ju alias and document allegations. | Guilt; the original submitted ID or video was not analyzed. |
| FBI notice ↗ | FETCHED · WANTED NOTICE | Official listed alias and public face source used in the labelled fixture. | A biometric match to a private applicant. |
| IC3 guidance ↗ | FETCHED · GUIDANCE | Review indicators and recommended organizational controls. | Person-level attribution or an employment decision. |
Pause only the access or onboarding step justified by policy; independently verify identity; route to authorized security/legal reviewers; provide notice, correction and appeal where required.