Solutions
Content moderation
Score uploads for AI generation and manipulation before synthetic content spreads.
8M
deepfakes projected to be shared online in 2025 — up from 500k in 2023Source: World Economic Forum
- Every upload scored at ingest
- Deepfakes, face swaps, full generations
- Evidence for moderators and reports
The threat
Synthetic media arrives faster than human moderation can review it: deepfaked public figures, AI-generated abuse material, and coordinated fake content at platform scale.
One API call between upload and publish
Detection slots into the ingest pipeline you already run: each uploaded image or video is scored by the REST API before it goes live, with the evidence behind it. Auto-action at high confidence and queue humans at medium, on thresholds your policy team tunes per surface.
Detection powers labeling, not just takedowns
Policy is no longer allow-or-remove, since much AI content is legitimate and the real duty is disclosure. A scored result lets platforms label routine synthetic content, restrict synthetic media of real people, and remove deceptive deepfakes (the World Economic Forum projected 8M deepfakes shared online in 2025).
/ROI
What this is worth
- Loss avoidance: as an illustration, at 50,000 checks a month, catching just 0.2% more synthetic media is ~100 frauds stopped — at a $10k average loss, that's ~$1M a month that never walks out the door.
- Review time: evidence-backed results cut manual review from minutes to seconds, so analysts handle the small flagged fraction instead of screening everything.
- One integration: a single REST API covers faces, documents, and devices — no second vendor, no second review queue.
Common questions
How do platforms detect AI-generated content at scale?
At platform scale, detection runs as an automated scoring step in the upload pipeline: every image and video is analyzed for generation artifacts, face swaps, and manipulation before publication, and the score feeds moderation rules as spam and abuse signals already do. Human review is reserved for the contested middle. ScamAI's REST API is built for this pattern, with real-time results at upload, batch endpoints for library rescans, and evidence attached to each result for moderator review and transparency reporting.
Can deepfake detection keep up with upload volume in real time?
Real-time detection at upload volume is an architecture question: the check must return a result within the latency budget of the publish flow and scale with traffic. ScamAI's API is designed for both modes — synchronous scoring for the upload path and batch processing for backfills and rescans — so platforms do not choose between coverage and speed. The practical pattern is scoring everything at ingest, auto-actioning only at high confidence, and letting the moderation queue absorb the borderline cases.
Should AI-generated content be removed or labeled?
Most platforms are converging on tiered enforcement rather than blanket removal: benign synthetic content stays up with a label, synthetic depictions of real people face restrictions, and deceptive deepfakes — fabricated statements, non-consensual imagery, fraud content — are removed. Every tier depends on knowing the content is synthetic, which self-disclosure alone cannot provide. Automated detection supplies that knowledge at scale, and results with evidence let platforms defend both the label and the takedown in appeals and transparency reports.
See ScamAI on Content moderation
15 minutes, on your own media. Pick a slot and leave with a result.